Blog
AI Strategies: The battle between local control and efficiency
Imagine a government that runs its own AI models entirely in-house. Without depending on the big tech guys. Sounds good? The practice is “just” different ...
The Dutch government is investigating whether AI models can run locally on its own servers by default. This seems like a solid step toward greater control and security, but it also brings major challenges. How do you prevent this strategy from hampering innovation? And where is the balance between security and efficiency?
With these issues, companies and policymakers alike face a crucial choice: control or efficiency?
This development joins a broader discussion about the pros and cons of running AI models locally versus using public AI services. Implementing AI locally offers organizations more control over their data. It also gives them the ability to develop custom solutions specific to their needs. This is offset by challenges such as higher initial investments in infrastructure and expertise, as well as the responsibility of keeping systems up-to-date.
Public AI services offer economies of scale, lower entry costs and rapid deployment. At the same time, their use raises questions about data privacy, dependence on external vendors and limited ability to adapt to specific organizational requirements.
But ehhh ... how realistic is it really to run AI yourself? And what are the pros and cons compared to public AI services? In this blog, I'll take you into the world of public and private AI.
The hidden costs of public AI services: convenience versus control
Public AI services such as ChatGPT, Claude and Grok offer unprecedented opportunities for companies looking to deploy AI quickly and without heavy investment. The benefits are clear:
- low initial costs
- direct access to advanced models
- No need to train or maintain AI models yourself
But behind this convenience lie strategic risks that should not be ignored.
Privacy and data security
One of the biggest concerns with public AI services is privacy. Many AI platforms are hosted by U.S. companies that fall under legislation such as the Cloud Act. This means that U.S. government agencies can access data in certain cases, even if it is stored outside the U.S. For organizations working with sensitive customer or corporate data, this poses a potential risk.
Cost advantage ... or cost trap?
The low entry cost of public AI seems attractive, but its reliance on third-party providers makes companies vulnerable to unpredictable price increases. What starts out as an affordable solution can quickly become a significant financial burden due to changed licensing models or increased usage costs.
Control over output and bias
When using public AI services, you have no control over the training data and associated bias. This can lead to unwanted or inaccurate results that do not match specific business needs. In contrast, a custom-trained model offers more reliable and more consistently aligned outcomes.
Downtime and dependency
Finally, dependency on the provider remains a risk. A failure, change in the AI model or a policy change can directly impact business operations, without your control.
Public AI is fast and accessible, but companies need to be aware of the risks. Those who want to maintain strategic control over AI must carefully weigh whether convenience outweighs the long-term implications.
Private AI: maximum control, but at what cost?
More and more companies are considering running their own AI models locally. The benefits are great: complete control over data, privacy and customization. But private AI also brings challenges, from high infrastructure costs to specialized knowledge needed for maintenance and optimization.
Complete control over data and privacy
One of the main reasons for choosing a private AI solution is data sovereignty. Sensitive business information remains entirely within its own infrastructure, without risk from outside parties or regulations such as the Cloud Act, which allows access by foreign governments. This is especially crucial for industries such as finance, healthcare and defense, where privacy and compliance are top priorities.
Customized training for specific needs
A private AI solution allows you to train a model on your unique data and business context. This leads to better results than generic public AI services, which train their models on a broad and sometimes irrelevant data set. The downside? Less flexibility and less rich content. A custom-trained model is often optimized for specific tasks and less versatile than a broadly trained public model.
Infrastructure and expertise: a hefty investment
Building and maintaining a proprietary AI infrastructure requires powerful hardware, specialized software and a team of experts. From GPU clusters to data management and security, these are costs and efforts that are barriers for many organizations. On the other hand, you don't have to depend on an external provider and therefore don't risk sudden cost increases or policy changes.
Scalability and maintenance
Whereas public AI provides immediate access to scalable computing power, private AI requires active monitoring and regular updates. AI models age quickly and lose effectiveness without ongoing retraining. This requires a structural strategy and the right resources.
Private AI offers maximum control and customization, but requires conscious consideration: do privacy, reliability and strategic autonomy outweigh investment and complexity?
Running AI yourself: what tools and platforms are out there?
For companies looking to run their own AI, powerful tools are now available. Choosing the right software depends on specific needs: from advanced deep learning models to efficient, on-premises language models.
1. OpenAI GPT (via API or locally with open-source variants)
Although OpenAI is best known for its cloud-based GPT models, there are open-source alternatives such as GPT-J and GPT-NeoX, which can run locally. They offer powerful language processing without dependence on external providers.
2. Meta Llama
Meta's Llama models are powerful language models that companies can implement locally. They offer a balance between performance and efficiency, especially for tasks such as text generation, summarization and code analysis.
3. Mistral AI
Mistral AI's advanced Mistral and Mixtral models are optimized for efficient, scalable AI solutions. They deliver strong performance on text processing and can be deployed locally depending on available hardware.
4. TensorFlow & PyTorch
For companies that want to train an AI model themselves, TensorFlow (Google) and PyTorch (Meta) remain the most popular frameworks. They are used for deep learning and machine learning and provide full control over training and optimization.
The right AI strategy for your organization
Running AI in-house is becoming increasingly accessible, but success depends on the right combination of infrastructure, software and expertise. The choice between public and private AI solutions is about balancing performance, privacy and scalability.
At Sciante, we know that AI is not a one-size-fits-all solution. Whether you want to optimize an existing environment or set up an entirely new private AI solution, we'll help you strike the right balance between control, cost and functionality.
Wondering what private AI can do for your organization?
Let's explore the possibilities in a no-obligation meeting. Get in touch and take the next step in your AI strategy.